Generate executive board reports with fiduciary risk scoring, vendor performance benchmarking, cost trend attribution, and ERISA compliance dashboards tailored for non-expert directors
Your broker presents the annual benefits review to the board. 47 slides of carrier jargon, utilization charts with no context, renewal rates with no benchmarking, and a recommendation to "stay the course." Directors ask: "Are we paying fair prices? Is our broker conflicted? What's our fiduciary exposure?" Broker deflects: "Industry standard." Board approves by default—they can't challenge what they don't understand. Two years later, a lawsuit alleges excessive fees. Directors: "We relied on our advisor." Plaintiff's expert: "No prudent fiduciary would accept those terms."
Our Board Reporting Engine generates distilled executive briefings with plain-English summaries, independent benchmarking vs. top-quartile plans, fiduciary risk heatmaps, vendor performance scorecards, cost trend drivers with attribution, and specific board action recommendations—8 pages, zero jargon, decision-ready.
Board Report Generation Algorithm// Executive board report structure REPORT_SECTIONS = [ executive_summary, fiduciary_risk_dashboard, vendor_performance_scorecard, cost_trend_attribution, benchmark_comparison, action_recommendations ] // Section 1: Executive Summary (1 page) GENERATE executive_summary: - Plan health score (0-100) - Year-over-year cost trend - Top 3 risks - Top 3 opportunities - Recommended board actions (3-5 items) // Section 2: Fiduciary Risk Dashboard (1 page) CALCULATE fiduciary_risk: erisa_compliance_score = AUDIT_readiness_engine() vendor_fee_transparency = FEE_disclosure_analysis() prudent_process_documentation = PROCESS_scoring() conflict_of_interest_exposure = COI_detection() risk_heatmap = VISUALIZE: - High risk (red): score < 60 - Medium risk (yellow): 60-80 - Low risk (green): > 80 OUTPUT: "Fiduciary risk score: 73/100 (Moderate Risk) Key exposure: PBM contract lacks rebate transparency (42/100) Recommendation: Require §408(b)(2) compliant disclosure by Q2" // Section 3: Vendor Performance (1.5 pages) FOR each vendor IN [broker, PBM, TPA, stop_loss]: SCORE across dimensions: - Cost competitiveness vs. benchmark - Service quality (claims accuracy, turnaround time) - Fee transparency (disclosed vs. actual compensation) - Contract favorability (client protections) overall_score = WEIGHTED_AVERAGE(dimensions) IF overall_score < 70: FLAG "Underperforming vendor — RFP recommended" // Section 4: Cost Trend Attribution (1.5 pages) DECOMPOSE cost_trend INTO: - Unit cost inflation (provider contracts): 42% - Utilization increase (member behavior): 28% - Mix shift (specialty drug growth): 18% - Population risk (aging, morbidity): 12% COMPARE TO: - Carrier's stated "trend factor" - Independent actuarial forecast - Peer plan benchmarks EXPLAIN deviations IN plain_language // Section 5: Benchmark Comparison (2 pages) COMPARE plan TO top_quartile_peers ON: - Total cost PMPM - Admin fees as % of claims - PBM spread pricing - Stop-loss margin - Network discounts FOR each metric: IF plan > peer_75th_percentile: FLAG "Above-market cost — investigate" // Section 6: Action Recommendations (1 page) PRIORITIZE board_actions BY: - Impact (cost savings or risk reduction) - Urgency (regulatory deadline, contract renewal) - Feasibility (board authority, vendor cooperation) FORMAT AS: "Recommendation 1: Issue RFP for PBM services Rationale: Current spread pricing 2.4x market rate Expected savings: $1.8-2.4M annually Timeline: Complete by Q3 for 1/1 renewal Board vote required: Yes"
Generate plain-English board reports with independent benchmarking, fiduciary risk scoring, and specific action recommendations. Turn your board from rubber-stamp to strategic oversight.
Request Engine Demo→